"François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > While I share Ingo's opinion, I also don't like the Translation Kit > > very much. It's designed rather poorly IMO and it's badly > > integrated > > with the rest as well. > Well it started as an amiga-like datatypes library... But the datatypes library is considerably superior to it. And API-wise, it's also a bit of an alien in BeOS. > > For images it's nice to have, but it's of little use beyond that > > right now. > It's not so useless, rather not used enough... > There were interesting ones from Gobe, but they used their own > closed format for output... (anyone has clues about that format > btw ? want to write translators / OOo import/export plugins) > It's not totally unflexible, I wrote a scanner one out of Sanity, > and someone else wrote a OCR translator... > It's true it's not really suited for media stuff though, that's > why there is a media kit. Yes, but that makes your "use translators for indexing" idea rather pointless, even though it would be a natural fit (if the kit were designed and integrated better). Right now, I'd prefer an indexing add- on that makes use of translators for images (and maybe text, too). > Maybe it's time to design something else, but I really want something > that can also set the meta-data on those files, as it's really needed > those days. Yeah, that would be nice. Also 6 years ago, though :-) For R2, I would like to rethink the whole translator stuff. Bye, Axel.