"Waldemar Kornewald" <wkornewald@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1/17/07, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yeesh. Sometimes I can't even write a complete thought. What a > > > meant > > > was that all that we really have is Zip, and while there are some > > > things package-related in the works for R2, I can't help but > > > wonder > > > if it needs to be sooner than that. > > Yes, but since it will take a long time until we may have settled > > on a > > feature set and the specifics, I would argue it makes a lot of > > sense to > > just adopt SoftwareValet packages for now, and have something > > better * > > after* R1. > Didn't we want to have app bundles for R2 (and packages for complex > installs)? Define "we" :-) Packet management requires a lot of thought and features, and OS X-like app bundles certainly only solve some problems (and introduce a bunch of others). Bye, Axel.