[openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:18:02 +0100 CET
François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> En réponse à Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > > It seems that the price for trying to put C++ in the kernel is an
> > > extremely ugly rite of passage!
> >
> > Nah, it isn't that bad. Barely 70 lines of code (mainly comments
> > and
> > empty lines ;-) make the most features available.
> >
>
> I'd rather do something else than put C++ in kernel though...
> One can really do OO coding without C++
But fortunately one doesn't have to. :-P
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: François Revol
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: François Revol