[openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:28:12 +0100 CET
Charlie Clark <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 23.02.2003 08:12:24, schrieb Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> :
>
> >Could someone explain to me which features of C++ I'm not allowed to
> >use in the kernel, preferably with an explanation of why, if
> >possible? And is it the same everywhere, or are certain parts more
> >restricted than others?
> >
> I've no idea about the technical reasons but this also applied to the
> BeOS kernel. There were some pretty
> good articles on this in the Newsletter
> http://be.befaqs.com/aboutbe/benewsletter/volume_III/Issue39.html
> http://be.befaqs.com/aboutbe/benewsletter/volume_III/Issue51.html
>
> It seems that the price for trying to put C++ in the kernel is an
> extremely ugly rite of passage!
Nah, it isn't that bad. Barely 70 lines of code (mainly comments and
empty lines ;-) make the most features available.
CU, Ingo
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: François Revol
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: Charlie Clark
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- » [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: François Revol
- [openbeos] Re: C++ in the kernel
- From: Charlie Clark