[haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
- From: "Dustin Howett" <alaricx@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-gsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:59:52 -0400
It seems to.. I followed Axel's recommendations; it has some issues on
my computer but I'm not so sure that's caused by my modifications. The
naming (and spacing) issues will be fixed in the updated patch (once I
have this committed to work off of, and get feedback on broken systems
from the community at large)
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Stefano Ceccherini
<stefano.ceccherini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2008/6/19 Dustin Howett <alaricx@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I have yet another patch for consideration (sending to haiku-gsoc so
>> all discussion on it can get captured here).
>>
>> I haven't tried it on native hardware but it boots in qemu (in both
>> uniprocessor mode and multiprocessor mode, the PIT and APIC timers get
>> used)
>>
>> It addresses many of Axel's concerns (anything that remains, please let me
>> know)
>>
>
> Hi Dustin (and everyone).
> Sorry for the delay, I got home only yesterday, and had to catch up
> with some hundreds of mails. I'm really sorry I haven't been more
> present last month, I'll try to do better in the future.
>
> I've tested the patch on my computer and under qemu, and it works
> flawlessly on both.
> I'm for applying the patch. There are only a couple of naming issues
> that had been brought up some time ago, but IMHO we can address them
> after the patch has been committed. Is this ok for everyone ?
>
>> Currently trying to find a good way to do it and overcome the booting
>> issues having them as "modules" brought.
>
>> Just tested, and it works perfectly fine on my system (both the PIT and APIC
>> timers)
>
> Does this means the problems have been resolved ?
>
>
--
- DH
Other related posts: