[haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))

From: "Dustin Howett" <alaricx@xxxxxxxxx>
To: haiku-gsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:03:04 -0400

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Dustin Howett <alaricx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I haven't tried it on native hardware but it boots in qemu (in both
> uniprocessor mode and multiprocessor mode, the PIT and APIC timers get
> used)

Just tested, and it works perfectly fine on my system (both the PIT
and APIC timers)

References:

[haiku-gsoc] New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
From: Dustin Howett

Other related posts:

» [haiku-gsoc] New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))
» [haiku-gsoc] Re: New timer patch (again) (Was: Re: First timer.diff (from private e-mails))