On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry for the late reply, and thanks for the changes! > There are still some style issues, and I can't really see why it's so > hard to fix them, like: > It's not so much that they're hard to fix, it's just that they're not second-nature to me yet and as such I can't spot them on-the-fly. > > But I still don't understand why you need the priority = -1 thing at > all. AFAICS, all timers are initialized in the loop, and the timers are > never iterated twice or partially; I would just remove it unless you > have a good reason for this construct. > Not all the timers are initialized in the loop. gAPICTimer is initialized in arch_smp.c because its init needs to be called once for each CPU apic_init (IIRC) is running on. Stefano and I are working out a better way to do this. > Bye, > Axel. Thanks for looking over the patch and your constructive criticism. -- Dustin