On 10/29/11, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not too fond of the idea. I think a tool like the pivotal tracker is > nice if there is some kind of project manager developer relationship (so > like GSoC, or even GCI), but it's pretty much useless outside of that scope. > I think it's already unfortunate that our WebPositive sources are separated > from our main trac, with a new tool it only gets worse IMO. I think Pivotal Tracker has nothing to do with where the source code is located, and it is a tool I will find useful for WebPositive development. If others find it useful, great. My working on it and setting up some tasks there shouldn't hurt anyone. > What we really should aim for is having a WebKit-development package like > ICU-devel, and put the WebPositive sources into our main repository. This > way, everyone can easily work on the browser at least, without going through > the hassle to build WebKit for yourself. This is something I've been talking about for a long time too. I never wanted the separate WebKit repo we have, and exactly what I predicted has happened: us getting really out-of-date. For everyone's info we are over 41500 changesets behind. I started the tedious 3-way merge process back in June but got burned out and then real life got in the way. Maybe Fredrik can get further, and I'll help however I can. But once that is done and we get all our changes merged upstream, developing our WebKit port and WebPositive as a browser will become separate projects, as I've talked about lately. But it might take a little while to get there. Either way, that is just a task to be done, which could be documented and organized at Pivotal Tracker, and for the likely small team of people who can and will work on WebKit and WebPositive, I think it will be a helpful tool. -- Regards, Ryan