[haiku-development] Re: Release Coordinator vs. Release Manager
- From: Augustin Cavalier <waddlesplash@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:44:46 -0400
On Jun 3, 2014 3:27 AM, "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Not sure what you mean, but where do you see the differences between those
> titles?
I don't really, but as I said, red tape. And it seems that some people use
the term "coordinator" anyway (the wiki calls it such)
> If I were you, I would probably be a bit pissed about Adrien's actions on
the
> bug tracker (I actually found that quite rude after the discussions on the
> mailing list).
Well, yes, but I wasn't going to say that.
> But while I agree that new APIs should not block a release, it
> doesn't mean that they can't be ready when the release is due.
Exactly.
> As I said, I think the tickets currently marked for alpha 5 (or those
that were
> marked) don't necessarily all need to be closed before the release.
Sometimes
> one realizes that there is no time to tackle all of them. We usually use
the
> priority to mark those tickets that really needs to be fixed, and that
may even
> delay a release.
Yes, that was my understanding too.
> BTW is there a ticket that tracks the PM issue Oliver mentioned? As that
would
> definitely be a release blocker.
ATM no. I should probably do that.
-Augustin
Other related posts:
