On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Alexander von Gluck IV
<kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Ok, I hate to admit it at this point.. but Ingo was right on the
recommendation to move the OpenGL kit into Mesa.
I'm still worried that us forking Mesa 7.8.2 may be a bad idea,
however at this point we have few other options. It's going to be
quite a bit of work to get Mesa 7.8.2 creating our libGL.so.
Are there any known programs from BeOS days that require OpenGL, and
for which ones do we no access to source code? And if so are those
program worth the effort that would be required to keep them running
on a gcc2 only system? What I'm saying is, is there even a good
reason to support OpenGL for gcc2? I mean we waited and waited for
the original OpenGL kit to come out from Be but was it ever released
in an official release? If not then maybe keep the focus on 9.3 for gcc4?
-scottmc
