On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Adrien Destugues < pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le 16/06/2010 12:29, Simon Taylor a écrit : > > If alpha 3 really is imminent (< 2 months or so) then just advising >> people experiencing these bugs to wait for the next alpha wouldn't be >> too bad. Definitely worth starting to agree on what changes should make >> it into Alpha 3 IMHO. >> >> > Yes... udating an alpha seems wrong to me. Going to the next one to improve > things is more likely to get us going forward to R1. I think it would make > sense to have a new release soon, either way : > * To expose the new features from gsoc, or, > * To have a stable alpha before merging gsoc work thet will break > everything. > > -- > Adrien. > > Things going wrong and being not perfect is why it is called an Alpha. Once an OS update system is in place this problem will no longer exist.