Alexander von Gluck <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:39 -0500, Ryan Leavengood wrote: > > Not all existing code, no matter who wrote it, is guaranteed to > > follow > > the coding guidelines. So it isn't really an excuse to point to > > someone else's code which doesn't follow the guidelines. > I know, and I knew pulling a random header is unfair. I just wanted > to > illustrate a point. No, it's not unfair, it doesn't make any sense. We have a coding style guide, and everything should follow it. Since our coding style evolved over the past years, it doesn't make sense to look at an quite old header for inconsistencies - the header was perfectly fine at the time. > I think the code style document on the website > needs cleanup and reformatting. I also know most of what Axel is > point > out are valid problems I need to work on. Everything I point out are valid problems :-) Besides that, feel free to improve the coding style guide if you can, just don't change what is there now without checking back. Bye, Axel.