[gmpi] Re: Requirements
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:45:47 +0000
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:38:36 +0100, Vincent Burel wrote:
> 1.3 : definition of "Control" !?
> personnally i would prefer to talk about different PIN type or PORT or
> interface if you prefer (that we would define later) attached to a specific
> protocole
> - PIN for audio stream.
> - PIN for automated parameter
> - PIN for MIDI
> - PIN for GUI communication
> - PIN for Persistence (put the "persistence" in the lexic)
> (no PIN are mandatory except maybe the persistence one)
This is a petty point, but I really dislike the term "pin", it smacks of a
hardware analogy, and not a particularly good one at that.
Port seems more reasonable when you need a term to describe the superclass
of "controls/parameters/data" and "audio streams".
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
