On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 08:45:21 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:11:51AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > > Anyway, I think we should stop this thread - my gripe was that the > > requirements included a paragraph that suggested that ramped, and unramped > > control streams were inherently different, and I'm not sure thats a good > > idea - I dont /really/ care how thats achieved. > > Suggest alternative language? Something like: Req 25: GMPI must provide ramped events for real valued controls, but plugins that do not require them must be able to convert to or receive point values. Req 26: GMPI must allow connection of any real valued control output to any real valued control input. - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe