[geocentrism] Re: World/Moon system

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:29:13 -0800

I agree with you, Allen. To claim that the Moon's gravitational attraction causes the tides and yet does not lift us off our chair does not make any sense.

This gravitational force in the heliocentric system is apparently like having a steel cable attaching the Moon to the World. A steel cable 600 miles in diameter. The whole of the British Isles taken up with a steel cable.

Sort of puts things into perspective.

Another way to put things into perspective is to take a bucket and fill it with water. Now hold it at arms length. The bucket of water has quite a weight. Yet the Moon whizzes around about a quarter of a million miles above our heads and pulls up the entire Atlantic Ocean!

And we feel ... nothing?

Neville.


-----Original Message-----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:18:54 -0700 (PDT)

1. The "smaller componet of motion" measured meassurment is consistently consistnet?

2. The location of a or the "berrycenter of any mass is totaly irrelevant for detection of accelerations...? .It produces tides for crying out loud...that is observable and detctabel and it is rediculous to suppose that the gravitaional forec or indeed any force nessisary to move that much seawater is somehow hidden in obsurity..if the grav/acceleration force were to obsuce to measure then it would be too obsure to create tides or aything else for matter in the first place...

 

I cant get over how you guys can swollow plain and blaitent logical contridictions with the ease of raw clams sliding down the back of your throats..............claiming somthing is there but not there at the same time explains nothing certianly not show it anymore reasonable then fairdust and grimlins from the krimlin do!

----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:54:56 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: World/Moon system

Neville J

 "...but did produce evidence of a much smaller component of motion."

If I am not mistaken, every time this experiment has been repeated, this 'smaller component' just keeps on getting smaller. Sounds a lot like measurement error to me.

"It should pull us toward the Sun and then away from the Sun. Would we feel any of this?"

I have only once seen a comment on the Earth/Moon barycentre -- it was quoted as being located some tens of kilometres below the Earth's surface. If we do approach/retreat from the Sun, then it is only about one part in 11000 of its average distance. Any effect would be difficult to measure.

 

Paul D

Smileys Preview
Get Free Smileys for Your IM & Email - Learn more at www.crawler.com/smileys
Works with AIM®, MSN® Messenger, Yahoo!® Messenger, ICQ®, Google Talk™ and most webmails

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocentrism
  3. Archive
  4. 05-2008