[geocentrism] Re: One step at a time
- From: "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:58:17 -0500
Dr. Neville -- I want to help your efforts. You are doing a very good thing
and you are on a blessed mission.
Religion and politics are my strong points and I'm a pretty good researcher
and communicator. Math and physics are my absolute weakest abilities.
I've always been a crusader, and as you know I've recently awakened to the
truths of Genesis 1 and geostatism.
Regarding my newfound understanding of cosmology, I'd like to be like the
woman at the well, run around and tell people. Before I do that, I need to
learn some more and decide the best way to do that..
I will keep reading and studying and following along with your list here. I
will try not to interfere or hold you guys up. Meantime, I will do whatever
I can to be helpful. Feel free to e-mail me privately with suggestions or
requests in that regard. I will cooperate in any way I can.
Thanks for letting me stay. I'm shocked to learn that everyone wants me to
stay -- I think.
As to "one step at a time," that's what the Good Book says, Sufficient for
the day is the evil thereof. Right? God will give you what you need. I
won't be pressuring you for answers. If I can't find them myself I'll ask
the others.
I guess people on this thread will help me to get my questions answered --
if I don't make myself into too much of a pest. You are so kind to take
time to let us all discourse and to help us along, to inspire us. I'd hate
to think that I'm slowing you down from your mission.
Sincerely,
Cheryl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 9:20 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] One step at a time
> Dear Cheryl,
>
> Dispensing with organic evolution and uniformitarian geology is easy, but
we are going for the grandaddy of them all - the heliocentric myth,
perpetrated by Kopernik. We sit amongst 400 years of contrived and contorted
"explanations" as to why what we see and sense is "not real." This is like a
ball of wool after a kitten has been playing with it for a few seconds. A
tangled mess, with other bits of string entwined with it, courtesy of the
highly confused Albert Einstein, et al.
>
> Now, we could try and undo the knots, but as fast as we unravelled a
little of one knot, we would be adding to another. I therefore decided to
throw the ball away and start again. This is why I get a little flak here
and there; for example, I am chided here for dismissing anything and
everything that NASA comes out with, and for my dismissal of supposed
geostationary satellites. But I take the position now that these things have
to be proven to me. The emphasis is then on the heliocentrist to prove his
or her contention, not for me to have to disprove it. I do not have the
time, nor the workers, to attack the ruling system the other way round,
except bit by bit. If I can put forward an alternative explanation for
something that I do not accept, then that is what I do. I got Philip, for
one, most annoyed with this as regards the supposed geostationary satellite.
He accused me of avoiding the issue.
>
> Rather than many threds going at once, I have thus to limit it to a few,
otherwise complete confusion will ensue. If we can reach an understanding of
an issue first, then we ought to be able to reach agreement as to what
importance we should attach to it. For example, the Apollo programme. My
position is this: the Moon landings never happened. Furthermore, they were
and still are physically impossible. This contention is either right or
wrong. If wrong, then the Homer Simpsons of BadAstronomy and other places
would need to overcome some enormous problems, which I do not need to go
into here, not just throw around juvenile postings to show each other how
clever they think themselves to be. The interesting alternative is that my
contention is correct, for then what would it say about NASA? What NASA
data, if any, could we ever believe? We would have to go back to before
NASA. Then what do we find? Something far less "certain" than what most
think we have now, that's for sure.
>
> So stick with it. Don't go away. The Bible states that this ruling
confusion will be destroyed. We therefore know that it will happen. In the
meantime, let's just be content with one step at a time. There are a couple
of atheists on this forum, but I am not allowing them to post at the moment,
not until we are all walking in the same direction, not only one step at a
time, but also in step with one another, to the benefit of all.
>
> Yours in Christ,
>
> Neville.
>
>
> "Cheryl B." <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Dr. Jones. I wish you Godspeed
in proving geocentrism.
> If I have anything of earth-shattering importance to share with the group
I
> will bring it to you privately and if you care to share it with the group,
> that's fine. I really have nothing to offer but questions and ill-informed
> comments at this time, and I realize I am more of an obstruction than a
help
> at this point.
>
> I'd like to continue to receive the postings from the group if you don't
> mind, but I won't post anything myself to the group, only to you
privately.
>
> Cheryl
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
>
>
Other related posts:
