[geocentrism] Re: New Scientist Mag. The ether rediscovered!
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
The most interesting thing concerning this article to me is the fact that they
are openly outlining how they are going to commit fraud, literally. Here is
what I mean. They say they are going to test the MM Experiment. to do this they
are going to increase the sensitivity of the apparatus by as much a 100,000
times. Now that is what MG experiment did, it had to because the effect it was
trying to measure was so much smaller. The MG experiment was to show the spin
effects of the aether relative to the earth. The MM experiment was to show the
orbital effects of the earth around the sun relative to the aether. The problem
was that MM failed to show any orbital speed around the sun while the MG
experiment showed the relative spin effects of the aether relative to the
earth.
Prediction: They will most certainly get a positive result. The technique of
this type experiment is valid.
The Fraud: They will be in essence using MG results to produce a positive MM
result. They will then say see it was there all the time. The equipment jsut
was not sensitive enough. Since the MM experiment showed basically a null
result and the MG experiment gave the exact expected results, and that did not
make sense, they through both experiments out. Now the are going to resurrect
the aether. All this, while simultaneously maintaining the Copernican paradigm
by doing s switch-a-rue, slight of hand. Use MG results to produce the
necessary MM outcome, Still ignore the MG experiment while all the time using
its results. And they are practically bragging about this!
Allen
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Philip,
You stated:
?Electromagnetic phenomena needs an aether to exist or operate in, but this
does not mean that the aether is a "physical medium" that propagates waves in
the mechanical sense. Electromagnetic phenomena is not a mechanical entity. It
is far bigger than a case of "apples" versus "oranges" An alternating magnetic
field at 1000hz IS NOT an alternating pressure wave in a medium at 1000 hz.
Their only commonality is mathematical. It is a mistake to make them analogous
in reality. That EMR varies in wavelength and speed in different physical
mediums should say something to these people.?
You could be right, but not necessarily the way you suggest. Although Energy
and mass can be equivalent they do not behave alike. They are two different
manifestations of what we have to work with in the universe. The differences
through the differing physical mass/mediums could just be due to the inherent
disturbances caused by the interaction /Function of both, that I spoke of
earlier.
I have suggested that the primary "forces" of the aether might apply primarily
to electromagnetic phenomena ?EMR?, where any effects on mass are a function of
the properties of that mass and the energy within the aether, not necessarily
the aether directly. The aether would serve as the primary conduit for
electromagnetic energy, something akin to currents with eddies flowing within
those currents. This would account for planetary epicyclical paths. The
"aether" in this sense might only affect the mass as a function of the energy
flowing through it (currents with eddies) and the properties of that mass.
Although the aether would be a ridged solid, spinning, the energy flows within
would behave with fluid like qualities. The mass would be carried by the energy
flows themselves, not the aether. However, because the energy flows (currents
with eddies) are located within the aether and the aether is spinning, the
Energy flows (currents with eddies) would be carried along with th
e aether
and take on the overall spin, around the earth, of the aether. While any mass
located in these energy ?EMR? flows would be carried along with those currents
and eddies of energy. The Aether does give EMR/energy a physical a medium
because "free" space has physical properties. That has already been
demonstrated. EMR in turn gives mass vectors, and the interactions/function of
both yields ?Forces?: Gravity, centrifugal, centripetal.. etc. However, these
two cannot interact with each other with out small disturbances/perturbations
of both; hence the variations in each. Just as EMR is affected by different
physical mediums, those same mediums are affected by the EMR that they are in
contact with: i.e. current through a wire or laser through a fiber optic line
and Vice versa. We use this principle in high end military detection systems as
well a rudimentary trigger mechanisms.
Allen
Philip wrote:
That article was very apt and relevant Jack. Notice it confirms what I said, in
that they went at it with a false presumption. such as,
"they reasoned, then all celestial bodies must have some velocity relative to
it. So someone standing on Earth and facing in the direction of its motion
through space would have an "ether wind" rushing past their face. According to
this thinking, a light wave travelling with the ether wind would seem to move
faster than a light wave heading into it. And Michelson and Morley set out to
prove this."
They assumed the aether was stationary, and everything else moved through it,
instead of with it. These modernists in their new experiment have not left any
opening to accept a different point of view which contradicts this false
assertion.
Of course the .rotating aether near the surface cuts through the experiment,
not the other way, so even had they detected the miniscule effect, it would
prove nothing.
But there is the further complication. The speed of the earths alleged movement
of 30 kilometres per second arouind the sun can have no relevance if it is non
existent. . They did mention 8k per second, detected, fut the equatorial aether
speed is 1670k/h is less than 0.5km/sec. So methinks there is something wrong
with the experiment in any case.
Why move away from a vacuum, and into dense gases? Their argument is of course
that the size of the equipment and a reduced wavelength would increase
accuracy. I would not trust any measurement outside a vacuum, or outside of a
solid which would suit their reasoning. Gases are subject to molecular activity
and thus irregular movement even in a constant? ? temperature. .
Finally the biggest presumption of all that has no merit in my thinking, is to
presume that EMR in an aether medium, which is not a material subject to
mechaical law, (other than as proposed in inertia) can be made synonomous with
wave motion theory as involved mechanically in the propagation of sound. The
aether will not propagate sound.
I rewrite the propagation of radio and light another way. Electromagnetic
phenomena needs an aether to exist or operate in, but this does not mean that
the aether is a "physical medium" that propagates waves in the mechanical
sense. Electromagnetic phenomena is not a mechanical entity. It is far bigger
than a case of "apples" versus "oranges" An alternating magnetic field at
1000hz IS NOT an alternating pressure wave in a medium at 1000 hz. Their only
commonality is mathmatical. It is a mistake to make them analogous in reality.
That EMR varies in wavelength and speed in different physical mediums should
say something to these people.
Philip.
Other related posts:
