[geocentrism] Re: New Scientist Mag. The ether rediscovered!
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:09:58 +1000
That article was very apt and relevant Jack. Notice it confirms what I said,
in that they went at it with a false presumption. such as,
"they reasoned, then all celestial bodies must have some velocity relative to
it. So someone standing on Earth and facing in the direction of its motion
through space would have an "ether wind" rushing past their face. According to
this thinking, a light wave travelling with the ether wind would seem to move
faster than a light wave heading into it. And Michelson and Morley set out to
prove this."
They assumed the aether was stationary, and everything else moved through it,
instead of with it. These modernists in their new experiment have not left any
opening to accept a different point of view which contradicts this false
assertion.
Of course the .rotating aether near the surface cuts through the experiment,
not the other way, so even had they detected the miniscule effect, it would
prove nothing.
But there is the further complication. The speed of the earths alleged movement
of 30 kilometres per second arouind the sun can have no relevance if it is non
existent. . They did mention 8k per second, detected, fut the equatorial aether
speed is 1670k/h is less than 0.5km/sec. So methinks there is something
wrong with the experiment in any case.
Why move away from a vacuum, and into dense gases? Their argument is of course
that the size of the equipment and a reduced wavelength would increase
accuracy. I would not trust any measurement outside a vacuum, or outside of a
solid which would suit their reasoning. Gases are subject to molecular activity
and thus irregular movement even in a constant? ? temperature. .
Finally the biggest presumption of all that has no merit in my thinking, is to
presume that EMR in an aether medium, which is not a material subject to
mechaical law, (other than as proposed in inertia) can be made synonomous with
wave motion theory as involved mechanically in the propagation of sound. The
aether will not propagate sound.
I rewrite the propagation of radio and light another way. Electromagnetic
phenomena needs an aether to exist or operate in, but this does not mean that
the aether is a "physical medium" that propagates waves in the mechanical
sense. Electromagnetic phenomena is not a mechanical entity. It is far bigger
than a case of "apples" versus "oranges" An alternating magnetic field at
1000hz IS NOT an alternating pressure wave in a medium at 1000 hz. Their only
commonality is mathmatical. It is a mistake to make them analogous in reality.
That EMR varies in wavelength and speed in different physical mediums should
say something to these people.
Philip.
Other related posts:
