[geocentrism] Re: Mars data
- From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:55:55 -0500
Philip,
1) Atmospheric effects due to uneven heating cause minor flicker. A
twinkling image will still be seen, if the image can be seen in the absence
of air thermals. If this isn't your meaning, please clarify.
2) Three assertions contrary to my understanding are made in this paragraph
without supporting evidence. Please supply corroborating references.
Thanks,
Robert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Philip
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:32 PM
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Mars data
>
>
> Under dark conditions at a distance of
> about 2 football fields, this simple experiment based on the scientific
> method of Aristotle and Bacon should verify if the Mars data is
> consistent.
> That is, can the dime be seen with the unaided eyes or not?
> AMDG, Robert
>
> Robert, this would not be a fair comparison. for two reasons.
>
> 1. Would not the effect of the atmosphere proportionally be different. ,
> but more importantly,
> 2.
> I thought it has been asserted that we would not be able to see
> the stars but for the curved atmosphere. People on the moon which
> has no atmosphere cannot see the stars. (without a telescope. or
> the lenze of a camera.) It was assertrd that this curved lenz of
> our upper atmosphere (perhaps the water vapor) magnified and
> focussed the light making them visible to our naked eyes.
>
> I wonder ?
>
> Philip.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
