[geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents.
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:08:50 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 5:08 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents.
> I cant answer either way Jack, as I do not quite clearly
follow/understand.
> your models. I will put my questions under yours below.
>
>
> >
> B The geocentric model consists of a rotating, fixed Earth with the Sun
> orbiting it.
>
> [Puzzle. If the earth is rotating in a fixed spot, and the sun is orbiting
> it, then what is the relationship of this. direction of rotation speed s
> etc.
> Why must the world rotate? Are we frightened to find an explanation for
the
> geostationary satellite? I'm not.
> I'm not disagreeing with Jack, but I have always taken geocentrism as
> meaning the earth DOES NOT ROTATE OR ORBIT.
There are two non-heliocentric models. See posting to Alan earlier.
Jack
Other related posts:
