[geocentrism] Re: Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:19:36 +0100
Dear All,
I think Allen's suggestion is sound and an efficient one.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:33 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
Yes, Robert a most generous offer, thank you......In light of Roberts offer
If Dr. Trampedach is willing to look at that comprehensive compilation, I
suggest all parties recess this discussion until such time as Dr. Trampedach
has had a chance to look at the book/ evidence. If he still is interested in
this discussion then we would all save alot of time by not wasting each others
time seeing...it covers just about every scientific argument that we would
address.......
sungenis@xxxxxxx wrote:
Thanks, Jack. That's the least I can do in this situation. I think Regner
(allow me to apologize for saying "Dr. Regner" in my last email, since it
should be Dr. Trampedach) needs to see the arguments in their complete and
scientific form to make an intelligent decision about this.
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:12 am
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
Dear Robert,
I'm glad you offered to do this because I was going to selectively extract
various items to put up for discussion. Your very generous offer to Regner has
saved me a lot of time.
Regards
Jack Lewis
----- Original Message -----
From: sungenis@xxxxxxx
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:58 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
Dr. Regner,
Recently, my colleague and I, Dr. Robert Bennett (Ph.D. in Physics, with
an emphasis on General Relativity), wrote a book (about 1,000 pages) titled:
"Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right." I myself was a physics major in
colleage, but my Ph.D. is in religious studies, so I am able to understand and
write about both the scientific and historical aspect of this issue, while Dr.
Bennett compliments the technical side of the issue.
Interestingly enough, prior to his signing on as a co-author of GWW, Dr.
Bennett was coaxed by a few of our mutual colleagues into trying to persuade me
against delving into geocentrism, much less writing a book about it. To his
utter dismay, after seeing the scientific evidence, he was thoroughly persuaded
that geocentrism had more than enough merit to become the perferred model of
cosmology, and this is a man who taught heliocentrism and General Relativity
for 30 years.
As for the book Volume I, which has 650 pages, contains all the
scientific evidence for geocentrism. Volume II, which has 400 pages, contains
all the historical evidence for geocentrism.
What we could do in addition to or in lieu of this discussion, is send
you a complimentary copy of Volume I. This way, you could see all the
arguments, many of which you would appreciate because of your astronomy
background. We dig real deep into the scientific evidence, so perpare yourself
for an exceptional ride, one that I'm sure you've never had in your whole
career.
If you oblige, just send me your Denmark address and I will see that a
copy is sent to you immediately. We also have a CDrom with 30 different
cosmological animations on it so that you can see the models in graphic form. I
will send that as well.
Looking forward to your reply.
Robert A. Sungenis
Other related posts:
