[geocentrism] Re: Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, Robert a most generous offer, thank you......In light of Roberts offer If
Dr. Trampedach is willing to look at that comprehensive compilation, I suggest
all parties recess this discussion until such time as Dr. Trampedach has had a
chance to look at the book/ evidence. If he still is interested in this
discussion then we would all save alot of time by not wasting each others time
seeing...it covers just about every scientific argument that we would
address.......
sungenis@xxxxxxx wrote: Thanks, Jack. That's the least I can do in this
situation. I think Regner (allow me to apologize for saying "Dr. Regner" in my
last email, since it should be Dr. Trampedach) needs to see the arguments in
their complete and scientific form to make an intelligent decision about this.
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:12 am
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
Dear Robert,
I'm glad you offered to do this because I was going to selectively extract
various items to put up for discussion. Your very generous offer to Regner has
saved me a lot of time.
Regards
Jack Lewis
----- Original Message -----
From: sungenis@xxxxxxx
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:58 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Dr. Regner: An invitation to you
Dr. Regner,
Recently, my colleague and I, Dr. Robert Bennett (Ph.D. in Physics, with an
emphasis on General Relativity), wrote a book (about 1,000 pages) titled:
"Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right." I myself was a physics major in
colleage, but my Ph.D. is in religious studies, so I am able to understand and
write about both the scientific and historical aspect of this issue, while Dr.
Bennett compliments the technical side of the issue.
Interestingly enough, prior to his signing on as a co-author of GWW, Dr.
Bennett was coaxed by a few of our mutual colleagues into trying to persuade me
against delving into geocentrism, much less writing a book about it. To his
utter dismay, after seeing the scientific evidence, he was thoroughly persuaded
that geocentrism had more than enough merit to become the perferred model of
cosmology, and this is a man who taught heliocentrism and General Relativity
for 30 years.
As for the book Volume I, which has 650 pages, contains all the scientific
evidence for geocentrism. Volume II, which has 400 pages, contains all the
historical evidence for geocentrism.
What we could do in addition to or in lieu of this discussion, is send you a
complimentary copy of Volume I. This way, you could see all the arguments, many
of which you would appreciate because of your astronomy background. We dig real
deep into the scientific evidence, so perpare yourself for an exceptional ride,
one that I'm sure you've never had in your whole career.
If you oblige, just send me your Denmark address and I will see that a copy is
sent to you immediately. We also have a CDrom with 30 different cosmological
animations on it so that you can see the models in graphic form. I will send
that as well.
Looking forward to your reply.
Robert A. Sungenis
Other related posts:
