[geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles ..part 2
- From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:39:33 -0800 (PST)
"A slight clarification, though; In HC the period of Earth's daily
rotation is the sidereal (stellar) day of 23h56m, which means that
the rotation of the camera (around the celestial axis) in the right
drawing, is due to the daily rotation."
Yes, but we are not limited to taking the exposures to 23 h 56 min... that
determines when the radial oreintaion to the ecliptic axis, on the ecliptic
plane happens.......
Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That, Allen, was a very clear and to the point post. Thank you.
I agree that your two figures and your explanation of them, are
consistent with HC.
A slight clarification, though; In HC the period of Earth's daily
rotation is the sidereal (stellar) day of 23h56m, which means that
the rotation of the camera (around the celestial axis) in the right
drawing, is due to the daily rotation.
- Regner
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting j a :
> Allen,
>
> Here is a new drawing for your consideration. And I would appreciate it if
> you limited your responce to the 1 question reguarding the drawing
>
> The left drawing is of a fixed camera position at 8 times during a single
> 24 hour revolution of the earth. The right drawing is of a fixed camera
> position at 8 times during a yearly revolution of the earth about the sun.
>
> The camera is setup parrallel to the nightly axis for convienence ( angle
> does not matter ) and is fixed wrt the earth for all 8 positions in each
> drawing (any angle change of the camera wrt any axis is due to the earths
> movement.
>
> 1) Do you see anything wrong with the geometry as I have represented it,
> assuming a HC framework?
>
> thanks,
> JA
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.
Other related posts:
