[geocentrism] Re: Apollo 13
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:04:01 +1000
This message was addressed to all. So I respond.
Personally I do not believe the moon landing was a hoax. Having seen the
original Black and white direct telecasts I do believe the published photos
were more than likely studio produced. And I see nothing wrong with that in
absolute terms.
Now back to work.
"Every body continues in its state of rest or motion in a DIRECTION GOVERNED BY
THE MOVEMENT OF THE AETHER except in so far as it is compelled by forces to
change that state."
Following on from my revision of inerpreting the law of inertia within the
aether, wherein I stated that this revision was necessary to
1. explain the geostaytionary satellite, and
2. explain how the lunar probes do not crash into a rapidly approaching moon ..
This latter , not withstanding my previous post to Neville on rocket science.
That post was merely an exercise in rocket science, and not an exposition of
what I think really happens. NASA would have had to know the problem, if they
had used such different dynamics to do it.
3. and essentially remove my original objection to Roberts washing machine
analogy, to explain inertia within the plenum. I had said there was vaccuum ,
and no medium within space.
That was said without thought about the physical effects or properties of an
aether upon enertia. (my mind was in a electromagnetic cloud)
I am composing a model to help explain this action, which I hope to post later
today, God willing.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: .
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:22 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Apollo 13
How is Apollo 13 explained according to moon-hoax theory? Was the
explosion deliberate or accidental? Is it your opinion that the command
and/or lunar excursion modules on Apollos 8-17 were empty shells, or
fully assembled and functioning units and that none of them ever left
low-earth orbit? Do you believe the Soviets were in on any hoax?
Other related posts: