[geocentrism] Re: Aether compression
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:18:43 +1000
Martin, can you point me to a link wherein I might examine that which I have
not heard of as highlighted in your post below....Philip.
Bouw has gone out of his way to show the holes in Newtonian theory, and agrees
with the experimental results that James Hanson has collated on these points
(the Long experiment using brass rings and a Cavenish torsion balance being
just one of many in this regard).
Search for "long experiment" found quite a few long ones LOL.
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin G. Selbrede
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:21 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Aether compression
Jack,
One must not tar Dr. Bouw with too wide a brush. He makes very important
distinctions when he discusses things like general relativity. He'll say, for
example, "there's nothing wrong with the mathematics of general relativity;
rather, it's the underlying assumptions that general relativity makes that are
wrong." In this instance, we see him distancing himself from the foundational
assumptions on which general relativity is based, but upholding its
mathematical apparatus as being correct (albeit applied to false assumptions,
therefore leading to false results). Moreover, Bouw puts forth the M-M and
Airy results as being geocentric, and one couldn't affirm that while
simultaneously pushing relativity. So, there is strategic value in citing
Einstein against MS for polemical purposes, but that's not where Bouw has set
his ultimate goal -- not by a long shot. Relativity is merely a debating
scaffold used for a narrowly defined purpose (to show the inconsistency of
those who regard a geocentric universe a physically impossible while they
simultaneously worship at Einstein's altar).
Bouw has gone out of his way to show the holes in Newtonian theory, and
agrees with the experimental results that James Hanson has collated on these
points (the Long experiment using brass rings and a Cavenish torsion balance
being just one of many in this regard). Truth be told, Bouw is partial to
LeSage and prefers LeSage to Newton. He holds to a modified form of LeSage. The
form of LeSage I hold to differs significantly from Bouw's variation, which is
different from Hanson's. There is no one "LeSage Model" -- the idea is merely
a framework, not a finished system. Until Hanson did the derivations, nobody
had ever even worked through the attenuation integrations to describe how
LeSage works. (In the original version, it was intractable and not reducible
to mathematical form. Hanson fixed that problem.)
Martin
On Jul 13, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Jack Lewis wrote:
I Have just had a quick scan through Bouw's primer and notice that he is
'relatavist' and upholds Einstein and Newton. Anyone know why? He would benefit
greatly from reading GWW. Why don't you send him a free copy Robert on the
condition that he comments on the chapters about Einstein?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 4:14 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Aether compression
It can be downloaded here...
www.geocentricity.com/geocentricity/primer.pdf
Phillip Stott <pstott@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Allen,
I don't have that geocentric primer. Where do I download it?
Blessings
Philip Stott
Martin G. Selbrede
Chief Scientist
Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc.
8708 Technology Forest Place, Suite 100
The Woodlands, TX 77381
281-825-4500 main line (281) 825-4507 direct line (281) 825-4599 fax
(512) 422-4919 cell
mselbrede@xxxxxxxxxxxxx / martin.selbrede@xxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/898 - Release Date: 12/07/2007
4:08 PM
Other related posts:
