Martin, can you point me to a link wherein I might examine that
which I have not heard of as highlighted in your post below....Philip.
Bouw has gone out of his way to show the holes in Newtonian theory,
and agrees with the experimental results that James Hanson has
collated on these points (the Long experiment using brass rings and
a Cavenish torsion balance being just one of many in this regard).
Search for "long experiment" found quite a few long ones LOL.
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin G. Selbrede
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 5:21 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Aether compression
Jack,
One must not tar Dr. Bouw with too wide a brush. He makes very
important distinctions when he discusses things like general
relativity. He'll say, for example, "there's nothing wrong with
the mathematics of general relativity; rather, it's the underlying
assumptions that general relativity makes that are wrong." In this
instance, we see him distancing himself from the foundational
assumptions on which general relativity is based, but upholding its
mathematical apparatus as being correct (albeit applied to false
assumptions, therefore leading to false results). Moreover, Bouw
puts forth the M-M and Airy results as being geocentric, and one
couldn't affirm that while simultaneously pushing relativity. So,
there is strategic value in citing Einstein against MS for
polemical purposes, but that's not where Bouw has set his ultimate
goal -- not by a long shot. Relativity is merely a debating
scaffold used for a narrowly defined purpose (to show the
inconsistency of those who regard a geocentric universe a
physically impossible while they simultaneously worship at
Einstein's altar).
Bouw has gone out of his way to show the holes in Newtonian theory,
and agrees with the experimental results that James Hanson has
collated on these points (the Long experiment using brass rings and
a Cavenish torsion balance being just one of many in this regard).
Truth be told, Bouw is partial to LeSage and prefers LeSage to
Newton. He holds to a modified form of LeSage. The form of LeSage I
hold to differs significantly from Bouw's variation, which is
different from Hanson's. There is no one "LeSage Model" -- the
idea is merely a framework, not a finished system. Until Hanson
did the derivations, nobody had ever even worked through the
attenuation integrations to describe how LeSage works. (In the
original version, it was intractable and not reducible to
mathematical form. Hanson fixed that problem.)
Martin
On Jul 13, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Jack Lewis wrote:
I Have just had a quick scan through Bouw's primer and notice that
he is 'relatavist' and upholds Einstein and Newton. Anyone know
why? He would benefit greatly from reading GWW. Why don't you send
him a free copy Robert on the condition that he comments on the
chapters about Einstein?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 4:14 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Aether compression
It can be downloaded here... www.geocentricity.com/
geocentricity/primer.pdf
Phillip Stott <pstott@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Allen,
I don't have that geocentric primer. Where do I download it?
Blessings
Philip Stott
Martin G. Selbrede
Chief Scientist
Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc.
8708 Technology Forest Place, Suite 100
The Woodlands, TX 77381
281-825-4500 main line (281) 825-4507 direct line (281) 825-4599
fax (512) 422-4919 cell
mselbrede@xxxxxxxxxxxxx / martin.selbrede@xxxxxxxxxxxx
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/898 - Release Date:
12/07/2007 4:08 PM
