For finding but not getting'into' Safecracker I would delete it. It clearly states on the cache page that you will have to work to get into the cache, but at the same time it is all up to the owner of the cache and what they think about it. I have seen folks 'find' a missing cache..."wave to the conductor"...and log it as a find since they KNEW they were in the right area!> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:02:28 -0600> From: asenger@xxxxxxxxx> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: What to do> > -> Bernie,> > I'd delete them myself. Signing the log is the proof that you were there.> > For example, I recently saw two "Found It" logs on Safecracker's> Cache. Both logs stated they found the cache but were unable to> actually open it. To me, that's not finding the cache.> > For all you know, the cacher didn't find the container at all, but> figured that since he was there (or was he?), he can get the credit> for it.> > Andrew (yawetag)> > On 1/10/08, Bernie <happykraut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> >> > I need some feedback on this one. There is a cacher who states in his logs> > "Did not sign log" , but claims it as a find. He has done this to three of> > my caches. What should I do? Delete or ignore. Bernie> > > -- > Andrew Senger> asenger@xxxxxxxxx> http://yawetag.110mb.com> "I can't win anything. In fact, if you look up 'loser' in the> dictionary, you'll see someone else's photo!" --Andrew Senger> > > ****************************************> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw _________________________________________________________________ Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_012008