[GeoStL] Re: What Does Your Log say?

Let me first say I just got home from work, I haven't read all the other 
replies nor really read this whole post....*bad me*.....so without further 
ado...
 
I am guilty of doing the 'TNLNSL TFTC' thing.  Not always for the same reasons. 
 Sometimes I have done  so many that I just get lazy. Sometimes I don't have 
anything to say but not because the cache is bad or anything...may  be that I 
had to sign quickly because a geomuggle was near...I don't think I have ever 
slammed someone's cache cuz I just am happy someone put another one out and I 
get to find it.  Basically if I feel like waxing poetically in a log then I 
will but if I don't then tnlnsl-tftc is it!  LuAnn ~~  MamaLu

TKLNHL <sydstyr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've been reading the forums and there's been a discussion about what finders 
write online.
 
http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=70128
 
 
There's a strong school of thought that an online entry that reads something 
like this:
 
"TNLNSL.  TFTC"
(Took nothing, left nothing, signed log.  Thanks for the Cache)
 
is really geo code for
 
"Your cache sucks"
 
Is this true? 
 
If you leave logs like this -- is that what you are really thinking?
How much time do you spend writing in the physical logbook as compared to the 
cyber log?
As a placer do you get a kick out of reading logs or do you even care?
 
I'm just curious.  I like reading interesting logs -- whether or not they help 
with finding the cache.  And naturally, you can imagine, that as the log-writer 
on our little family team, some of "our" logs may..  digress...   Do those kind 
of logs "bother" you?
 
I swiped this post from the forums:
 
"I"'m surprised no one has stated the obvious. TNLNSL could be considered what 
folks in the quality industry call an indicator. 
-If you never see it in the logs the cache is probably stellar. 
-If you see it in the logs occasionally, either those individuals either didn't 
care for the cache, were tacitern9sp?), or were in a hurry. 
-If most of the logs are TNLNSL it may well be a stinker. 
-If [b]all[/n] the logs are TNLNSL you probably qant to put the cache on your 
ignore list. "
 
Does this hold true in this area? I think I've seen some TNLN entries on what 
others thought were good caches? Is this a "less is more" area LOL?
 
Just ..   things to discuss...
 
Nancy

Other related posts: