[GeoStL] What Does Your Log say?
- From: "TKLNHL" <sydstyr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Geocache STL List" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:39:45 -0500
I've been reading the forums and there's been a discussion about what finders
write online.
http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showtopic=70128
There's a strong school of thought that an online entry that reads something
like this:
"TNLNSL. TFTC"
(Took nothing, left nothing, signed log. Thanks for the Cache)
is really geo code for
"Your cache sucks"
Is this true?
If you leave logs like this -- is that what you are really thinking?
How much time do you spend writing in the physical logbook as compared to the
cyber log?
As a placer do you get a kick out of reading logs or do you even care?
I'm just curious. I like reading interesting logs -- whether or not they help
with finding the cache. And naturally, you can imagine, that as the log-writer
on our little family team, some of "our" logs may.. digress... Do those kind
of logs "bother" you?
I swiped this post from the forums:
"I"'m surprised no one has stated the obvious. TNLNSL could be considered what
folks in the quality industry call an indicator.
-If you never see it in the logs the cache is probably stellar.
-If you see it in the logs occasionally, either those individuals either didn't
care for the cache, were tacitern9sp?), or were in a hurry.
-If most of the logs are TNLNSL it may well be a stinker.
-If [b]all[/n] the logs are TNLNSL you probably qant to put the cache on your
ignore list. "
Does this hold true in this area? I think I've seen some TNLN entries on what
others thought were good caches? Is this a "less is more" area LOL?
Just .. things to discuss...
Nancy
Other related posts:
