[GeoStL] Re: Policy Negotiations in Rolla
- From: Brian Maddox <gowaddle@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:12:00 -0800 (PST)
-
See, I'm not sure I'd agree with that any more in light of the recent PAWB
actions from our friend in Springfield. By requiring a permit, it seems to
me that it reinforces that the cache is legally there and not considered
"abandoned property", trash, or whatever someone might use to justify their
stealing a cache. So if it has a permit, and the PAWB decides to steal it,
then maybe it is a stronger case legally that it could be considered theft
and legal action could be taken. Dunno.
--- Lazylightning <lazylightning7@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -
> Hey Dan,
>
> You might want to tell them that by requiring permits, they are making more
> work for themselves than necessary. You might consider volunteering to
> check out caches placed for compliance to their rules and promise to report
> problems if any are found. That way they are having someone checking
> things
> out without any manpower on their part. The reason State Parks requires
> prior permits are that there are some areas that are closed/restricted to
> visits. None of our local parks are so pristine to require that degree of
> care.
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html
****************************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the
Subject field
Other related posts:
