- Not necessarily.
- See, I'm not sure I'd agree with that any more in light of the recent PAWB actions from our friend in Springfield. By requiring a permit, it seems to me that it reinforces that the cache is legally there and not considered "abandoned property", trash, or whatever someone might use to justify their stealing a cache. So if it has a permit, and the PAWB decides to steal it, then maybe it is a stronger case legally that it could be considered theft and legal action could be taken. Dunno.
--- Lazylightning <lazylightning7@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - > Hey Dan, > > You might want to tell them that by requiring permits, they are making more > work for themselves than necessary. You might consider volunteering to > check out caches placed for compliance to their rules and promise to report > problems if any are found. That way they are having someone checking > things > out without any manpower on their part. The reason State Parks requires > prior permits are that there are some areas that are closed/restricted to > visits. None of our local parks are so pristine to require that degree of > care. > >
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html
****************************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
---------------- Glenn