-
Why bring Jesus into it????
But, since you already have, i'll say this. I can't speak for Him anymore
that you or anyone else can, but He confronted sin (i'm not saying this is
sin) & He did it both publicly & privately.
BTW, I have brought this subject up before, & with without mentioning names.
However, noonne even responded. Maybe puting a name with the action, or lack
there of will have a positive result. maybe not...
Eric
Eric
- When you list an individual it is bashing. If the statement was made not using any names then it would be just stating facts.
This is all I have to say about this matter, it is closed as far as I'm concerned.
What would Jesus do? Tim
-----Original Message----- From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eric East Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 3:36 PM To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [GeoStL] Re: New record 2,000 finds 0 hides
- I respectfully disagree with you. It's not bashing it's stating fact. This is a geocaching forum & we discuss all things geocaching related; which includes selfish practices. Sure it's a game, but we should all give something back to the game.
Eric
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim & Pam Ueltzen" <timpam2mocachers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 3:16 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: New record 2,000 finds 0 hides
- I don't think this kind of personal bashing needs to be on the free list. If someone has a problem with another cacher they need to confront them OFF LIST.
Just my two cents worth. Tim
-----Original Message----- From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Bensman Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:51 PM To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [GeoStL] New record 2,000 finds 0 hides
- I just noticed Pa recently became the only geocacher to have 2,000+ finds and 0 hides.
I'd be embarrassed to take so much and never do anything in return. I was
amazed at how many people with more than 2,000 finds have 5 or less hides.
But PA is the only one to never hide a cache. The next closest without a
hide is 1,651 finds.
IMHO, there should be etiquette guidance on how many you should hide per 1,000 finds. I'd think you should at least hide 5 per 1,000 finds.
Jim Bensman Myotis
**************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html **************************************** To unsubscribe from this list: send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
**************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html **************************************** To unsubscribe from this list: send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
****************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html
****************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the
Subject field
****************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html
****************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
