[GeoStL] Re: FW: Report for 'geocaching' on error watches
- From: Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 09:18:48 -0500
Yea, That's what everybody does and we have never really discussed it much.
I guess I should put together some guidelines for general email list use. We
do things a little differently here as I have not been picky about sending
HTML formatted email or attachments to the list. As most folks know, both of
those things are a big NO-No on most lists and will bring down the wrath of
the email police onto your heads as it really sucks up server bandwidth and
increases the un-security levels a little. I don't mind HTML too much and
clean attachments have been OK with me. Pictures ect are nice to get now and
then. I don't think we have had any trouble with either so I have never
configured to reject them.
Glenn
Do ya want to go cache in the rain?? I'll let you carry the (metal)
umbrella.
-----Original Message-----
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of GC-RGS
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 9:06 AM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: FW: Report for 'geocaching' on error watches
I think the limit of 30 is good. I think we all just read the new part and
ignore the rest. I forgot to cut out the old text on that other one, but it
looks like the whole thing came through anyway.
If you're heading out to 3 fords and Cuiver River, you better go soon. Looks
like BIG storms getting close. We don't want you to melt.
*****************************************************************************
Our NEW WebPage! WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List & Archive Info.
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
Msg. of the day, "The peacemaking meeting scheduled for today has been
cancelled due to a conflict."
******************************************************************************
Other related posts: