Re: [foxboro] WP51D Stand-alone
- From: Jeremy Milum <jmilum@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:46:50 -0600
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 03:32:59 -0500, "Bakker, Ren=E9"
<rene.bakker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The rule is simple: AW will boot standalone, WP will not and requires a
> connection to a DNBI, DNBT or DNBX.
> This has been the case from the beginning of the 50 series=20
In my previous reply I specificed a nodebus WP. I seem to remember that
if the WP was setup for ethernet only (e.g. a Micro I/A type system) then
it would boot fine stand alone (which would make sense since there would
be no nodebus to connect it to)
--=20
Patron saints in general are broadband connections to the Almighty
- Michelle Delio, Wired News
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
