I looked through the document and found the maximum number of Inter Process Connections (IPC)'s be 51 for FCP270 however I did not see any reference to the total number of values that can be passed (ie peer to peer connections). I suppose the limit will depend on the type of connection (ie bit, float, int). Just curious if anyone has hit any limits? mk Terry Doucet wrote: > Have a read of EDOC B0193BC - Object Manager Calls > Be clear on the issues of:1. Inter Process Connections - IPC's both SINK and > SOURCE connections which are connections between stations. There are limits > on the numbers of these but with current technology you are not likely to run > into these limits. > 2. Object Manager (OM) Lists - The SINK station creates an OM list of C:B.P > that it wants and the SOURCE station will create an OM Scanner Entry for the > C:B.P that it owns to send the updated data to the SINK. Different stations > have different sized OM lists and Scanner Entries. See Table 1-2 in the EDOC. > Scanner Entries are formed from the Source station for points in the OM > lists that are to be scanned (monitored for changes in value). The Int30 has > the same limits as the CP30 and for Scanner Entries it is 150 points. Once > you reach 150 in the Int30, the next station to request data (perhaps a new > WP coming online and displaying points from this Int30) will not get data. > The tools som and rsom are used to count the numbers in the various > lists and entries. > When a SINK station is rebooted it will broadcast its letterbug. SOURCE > stations are supposed to watch for these broadcasts and close out lists and > connections that were initiated by the rebooting station. So if you reboot > and AW, all the points in its historian (for example) that are in Int30 are > wiped out in the Int30 OM and then new demands for updates (graphic called in > a WP) are able to use the resources in the Int30 to populate the graphics. > Terry > > >> From: Jack.Easley@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:19:03 -0500 >> Subject: Re: [foxboro] OM lists >> >> I hesitate to answer as I was into this so long ago it's fuzzy, but I'll >> make two comments. Hopefully someone else with recent experience can help >> you more. >> 1. show_params is just the tip of the iceberg. You must learn about rsom and >> som to track these problems to the source. Not easy as I can't readily tell >> you where to find documentation, although perhaps Alex Johnson or your Fox >> Service Rep can help. All show_parms will indicate is the number of local >> lists and other resources you are using at any given time versus the number >> you (aka Foxboro) have configured to be maximum. >> 2. The Integrator 30 probably isn't the culprit, it's just where you see the >> symptoms from lack of resources on the AW (especially if you do not see this >> on the same displays other WP/AWs. The real problem is probably remote >> display access, or Aspen, or a custom C application, etc running (or that >> has run) on the AW. >> >> Jack Easley >> Sr. I&C Technician >> Luminant Power, Martin Lake Plant >> Phone 903.836.6273 >> jack.easley@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Brown, Stanley >> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 2:57 PM >> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [foxboro] OM lists >> >> Can you clarify something for me? >> >> If the AW in question had established OM lists to the Integrator 30 in >> question, would these lists show up with show_params? If (somehow) the >> Integrator 30 had established lists with the AW (why would it do this?) >> would show_params show these lists? >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Stan Brown [mailto:stanb@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P >>> (IOM) >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:59 AM >>> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: [foxboro] OM lists >>> >>> /usr/local/show_params reports on ONLY the station on which it is >>> running. >>> >>> Rsom (remote stations) and som (local station) can be used (not as a >>> scripts (easily) though) to monitor OM list usage. There is some >>> documentation in B0193JB. >>> >>> If the GW/DI ran out of lists opened by the AW, there is some program >>> on the AW that is not closing its lists properly. You can use rsom to >>> examine the lists in the GW/DI and determine what tags are in use. >>> Often that will tell you the application that opened the lists. Also, >>> you can look at the PID of the process that opened the list in the GW >>> and the station that opened the list. This can be used to identify who >>> is opening lists and still running. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Alex Johnson >>> Invensys Operations Management >>> 10900 Equity Drive >>> Houston, TX 77041 >>> +1 713 329 8472 (desk) >>> +1 713 329 1600 (operator) >>> +1 713 329 1944 (SSC Fax) >>> +1 713 329 1700 (Central Fax) >>> alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx (current) >>> alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (good until September 2010) >>> >>> >>> Attend OpsManage'10 >>> Real Collaboration. Real-Time Results. >>> >>> Click Here to learn more about these events and to register. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro- >>> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of stan >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:42 AM >>> To: Foxboro List >>> Subject: [foxboro] OM lists >>> >>> WE had an instance where we ran out of OM lists last night. Foxboro TAC >>> logged in and determined that the AW on this node was using too mangy, >>> and >>> we resolved the issue (for the moment) by rebooting this machine. >>> >>> However,, I am not convinced we have found the root cause on this. The >>> configuration on this node has been stable for quite a while, and the >>> last >>> time the AW was rebooted was 150+ days ago, after an upgrade to 7.1.5 >>> software. >>> >>> We have run a variant of the checkit script from the Casandra site for >>> a >>> number of years, and it uses /usr/local/show_params to report on some >>> OM >>> statistics. Frankly I am not all that familiar with the output of this >>> section of the report. Can someone tell me if these values are global >>> to >>> the node? If not, is there a script that I can run to get statistics >>> for a >>> specific station (AB integrator 30A in this case). >>> >>> Thanks for any suggestions as to forensics on this. >>> >>> -- >>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >>> A: Top-posting. >>> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process >>> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at >>> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html >>> >>> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro >>> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join >>> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave >>> >>> >>> >>> *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or >>> attached files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to >>> which it is addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be >>> legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice >>> of its status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and >>> then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use >>> it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. This >>> email comes from a division of the Invensys Group, owned by Invensys >>> plc, which is a company registered in England and Wales with its >>> registered office at 3rd Floor, 40 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7AW >>> (Registered number 166023). For a list of European legal entities >>> within the Invensys Group, please go to >>> http://www.invensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_idw&nav_id€&prev_ >>> idw. >>> >>> You may contact Invensys plc on +44 (0)20 3155 1200 or e-mail >>> reception@xxxxxxxxxxxxx This e-mail and any attachments thereto may be >>> subject to the terms of any agreements between Invensys (and/or its >>> subsidiaries and affiliates) and the recipient (and/or its subsidiaries >>> and affiliates). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process >>> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at >>> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html >>> >>> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro >>> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join >>> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave >>> >>> >> The information contained in this message and any attached files may be >> privileged and/or confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not >> the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any >> of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly >> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please so >> notify the sender immediately without reading it. Also, please promptly >> destroy the original transmission and its attachments. Any views or opinions >> presented in this message or attachments are those of the author and do not >> necessarily represent those of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation or >> its subsidiaries. >> >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process >> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at >> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html >> >> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro >> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join >> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave >> >> >> >> Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, >> contains or may contain confidential information intended only for the >> addressee. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, be advised >> that any reading, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying or other use >> of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by >> reply message and delete this email message and any attachments from your >> system. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process >> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at >> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html >> >> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro >> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join >> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave