Re: [foxboro] CP270 Block Count Limitations; Grrrr
- From: Dirk Pauwels <dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:38:49 +0000
We should join forces, our ZCP270's have a relative small amount of blocks but
are low on memory. ... ;-)
Rgds,
Dirk
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens
William C Ricker
Verzonden: vrijdag 6 maart 2015 5:44
Aan: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Onderwerp: [foxboro] CP270 Block Count Limitations; Grrrr
...
Even with gobs of memory left, and not even approaching overload, we slam
hard against block count. It seems, though I have no actual quantitative data
to prove it, that the CP60s are more capable for this application than the 270s.
OK, venting over.
William C Ricker
FeedForward, Inc.
________________________________
Lawter Notice: The information (including any attachments) contained in this
communication is confidential, private and proprietary, may be privileged or
otherwise protected by applicable law or legal rule, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee(s). Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or
copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail,
or by calling the sender, and then delete it completely from your system.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
