[ExchangeList] Re: Exchange 2007 Organitational Issues

  • From: David Sierra Fernández <SieFerDa@xxxxxxx>
  • To: "exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:46:41 +0200

Jejejeje……you’re right with executive assistants……Thank you very much Paul for your answer!!!!


Guys, any other point of view before taking a decision????


De: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Maglinger, Paul
Enviado el: miércoles, 11 de agosto de 2010 14:27
Para: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [ExchangeList] Re: Exchange 2007 Organitational Issues


We have “send as” privs to certain distribution lists where it is necessary for everyone on it to be included in the reply (certain committees).  Up to now these committees have been responsible enough not to abuse the privilege.

We also have contract labor in our organization which use external emails which have been added as contacts and included in distribution lists without problems.

“Send on behalf” and “Send As” privs are usually reserved for Executive Assistants because we all know they run the company anyway.  J




From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Sierra Fernández
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:04 AM
To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ExchangeList] Exchange 2007 Organitational Issues


Hi all,


Perhaps this question is a bit off topic but I would like to know your opinion as a Exchange Administrators and Managers. In our organization, we are now involved in describe the services we are going to offer to our exchange 2007 users and we have a lot of doubts:


·         Users want to “send as” distribution lists, but we are not sure about the convenience of this…..

·         Users want to include external email address in internal distribution lists (partners, clients,…). This would increase very much de number of email contacts in the exchange organization and we are not sure if the we are going to have problems related to SPF. (For example, someone external sends an email to one of internal lists that contains another external address)

·         Users want to “send on behalf” and “send as” shared mailboxes. We are not sure to allow this since send on behalf is a Microsoft feature and other clients, overall web clients, don’t understand it. “Send as” is a bit dangerous because the sender is hidden but we are aware that this feature is necessary in some cases.


I would be very grateful if you share your experience about this.





David Sierra

Messaging Administrator



Other related posts: