[esnr] Re: The SAN-Clan
- From: Joe Siri Ekgren <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:07:23 +0200
Dear Berrie,
At 08:56 +0200 18.06.04, Berrie Gerrits wrote:
[...]I would say, like Dr. Congedo and like more
clinical oriented collegues: go
back to negotiate with iSNR and try to implement the European ideas. There
is strength in numbers.
And one may also say that too many cooks spoil
the broth. I am not on the board, so I speak for
myself. It makes sense to me that we spend our
resources on creating instead of negotiating.
This list is case in poin, brimming with energy
and a positive climate which is refreshing.
Secondly: it seems that Trontheim is going to be the place where a future
University degree in QEEG and NT can be obtained. This strikes me. Why not a
more central place like Zürich, München, Prague, Paris, etcetera?
Trondheim will be one place to obtain training,
and neuropsychologist Knut Hestad has slowly but
surely built NF and qEEG into the psychology
curriculum at the Norwegian Technical University
(NTNU). The model of cooperation may be freely
copied, so I think that the future will bring a
score of universities that will offer NF and qEEG
training, not just Trondheim.
But mainly my question is: what are the political agenda's behind all these
developments??
I am not sure what you have in mind. I feel the
board has communicated its intentions quite
clearly in thirteen succinct and concrete points.
I think it is good to keep in mind that all the
marvelous work in the ESNR/SAN is done on a
voluntary basis. In my opinion SAN is a group of
dedicated clinicians and scientists trying to
make the best with limited resources. I believe
SAN is a way of conserving energy while promoting
the field. Tip of the hat to all those
contibuting in big or small ways!
best regards,
--
Joe Siri Ekgren MD
Oslo, Norway
Other related posts:
