Re: [POLL] mount: sync or async?

On 9/4/07, Grégory SCHMITT <gy.schmitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I thought this would be a good change, but since rel. 0.3.5, most of my
> mounting of an optical disc fail. My feeling is that before, mount was
> waiting for the device to probe the disc (which can take a few
> seconds depending on the performance of your optical drive). Now, mount
> doesn't wait as long for the disc to be probed and exits quickly.

I imagine this could be solved by implementing a timeout.


> So, here's my poll to all emelfm2 users: would you like to keep mounting
> asynchronous or revert back to synchronous mounting ?

Would have to try to see the real difference, but generally I think it
is better for _all_ emelFM2 operations to be asynchronous (of course,
wherever possible).

-- 
Liviu
Rǫ�Ƨ�{.n�+��������b�����݊x������zW�ڷ���-~���+-����+a�{.n�+�����^���y�_��]����� 
�x"��-��n)�z��q

Other related posts: