Re: [POLL] mount: sync or async?
- From: "Liviu Andronic" <landronimirc@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:04:20 +0200
On 9/4/07, Grégory SCHMITT <gy.schmitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I thought this would be a good change, but since rel. 0.3.5, most of my
> mounting of an optical disc fail. My feeling is that before, mount was
> waiting for the device to probe the disc (which can take a few
> seconds depending on the performance of your optical drive). Now, mount
> doesn't wait as long for the disc to be probed and exits quickly.
I imagine this could be solved by implementing a timeout.
> So, here's my poll to all emelfm2 users: would you like to keep mounting
> asynchronous or revert back to synchronous mounting ?
Would have to try to see the real difference, but generally I think it
is better for _all_ emelFM2 operations to be asynchronous (of course,
wherever possible).
--
Liviu
Rǫ�Ƨ�{.n�+��������b�����݊x ������zW�ڷ���-~���+-����+a�{.n�+�����^���y�_��]�����
�x"��-�� n)�z��q
Other related posts:
