geez ..... that kind of overdrive would make me want to row too. Although the 2004r is .67 I really liked the Monte trans........ I need to save up some dough for that trans I found. JC On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Jim Dos <jdos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IIRC, the t56 I had in my 96 camaro was a double overdrive, and 6th was > like a .68 or something like that.**** > > I could be wrong, but it cruised at 55 at 1400.. something ridiculous low. > **** > > ** ** > > Jim**** > > ** ** > > *From:* elky-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:elky-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *STILLFRANKSFAULT@xxxxxxx > *Sent:* Sunday, October 30, 2011 4:16 PM > *To:* elky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [elky] Re: Oh, hell! (transmission questions, too)**** > > ** ** > > If I'm guessing correct isn't salt racing more of a top end important mind > set? If so the least loss of hp in a transmission would be preferred. So to > gain that 1 to 1 final ratio, in an automatic, you would only get that in > an overdrive unit with lockup converter.**** > > All manuals will give that final 1 to 1. Manual shifting seams to be an > advantage on a road course. Autos, are big in bracket racing for their > consistency with straight line driving. **** > > **** > > **** > > Smokey Mt Frank **** > > **** > > In a message dated 10/30/2011 12:16:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > rbuck@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:**** > > Now. I'm looking at manual transmissions. As I wrote in another post, I > didn't like the feel of driving a race car with an automatic...even one I > was shifting manually. It just felt mushy with the 3500 rpm > converter...and I only got about 3/4 mile to try to get a feel for it at > WOT. Anyway, this brings up the question of "which transmission?" I need > an overdrive if I'm gonna use a GN or T-Type 8.5" rear end...iirc, they > have as stock, 3.42 gears. If I go with a Ford 9", then the overdrive > thing won't matter. Anyway, the transmissions I've considered with that > 8.5" are the Tremec 3550 and the GM T-56...I guess it's technically at > Tremec, too. **** > >