[ebooktalk] Re: bookshare.
- From: "Shell" <shell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:45:58 +0100
I don't know the details, but it looks like it's been signed without all the
clauses that were going to render it useless. I believe In Touch are going to
do a big piece on what it will mean for us in next Tuesday's show.
Shell.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Steven Bingham" <steven.bingham1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:04 PM
To: <ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ebooktalk] Re: bookshare.
> Has the treaty been signed?
>
>
>
> When I last read about it some people were trying to make the small print
> say that if it was available to buy then it could not be shared. The World
> Blind Union was up in arms about it and I tink I signed (or tried to sign) a
> petition.
>
>
>
> At a first glance such a clause could have repercussions for a lot more
> people than just Vis.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> From: ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of David Russell
> Sent: 27 June 2013 15:15
> To: ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ebooktalk] Re: bookshare.
>
>
>
> Shell
>
>
>
> It certainly sounds promising. I see no reason why we should not now have
> full access to Bookshare titles.
>
>
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> From: ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ebooktalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Shell
> Sent: 27 June 2013 12:31
> To: ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ebooktalk] bookshare.
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, if anyone knew if the success of the Treaty in the
> Conference in Marrakesh means that we will be able to join bookshare as full
> members?
>
> I would love to be a member of that library.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Shell.
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
