[ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: "Phil Halton" <philhalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:56:37 -0500
What happened is: I was recording an audio stream from the internet which
played through my jaws soundcard. I routed the jaws soundcard into the
sonar soundcard--so far so good. When testing the input level, I mistakenly
got the spike in level when jaws announced the meter level-not the level of
the streamed program. So, jaws level was around -5db, and that's what I
mistakenly read as the level for the stream. Fooled myself pretty good with
that one!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Christer" <m-christer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 11:59 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
Try pushing the input level until it distorts, then back it off a little,
and see what the post meter reading is!
It might do the trick, possibly showing that Sonar isn't seeing the input
properly?
I dunno, might work...
Alternatively, have you reset and refreshed the meters etc?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Halton" <philhalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 4:39 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
that's what I did, I armed track, and read meter with f2 after first
resetting the meter with triple f2. it read approx -5 DB, then on
playback with track unarmed, meter read approx -17 db. I changed no
settings--I just loaded the normal template into a new session of sonar,
and began recording after checking input level. I haven't really given
much attention to this aspect of sonar(digital audio recording), and I'll
have to investigate it a little more with an eye towards this problem.
.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Christer" <m-christer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 9:11 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
Phil!
When looking at the input level, make sure the feedback you get from
JAWS says, "input", and not "output"?
I guess you know that you should take the meter level when the track is
actually armed?
Mike
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Luis Elorza" <luiselorza@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 4:18 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
maybe you lowered the volume for that track. the meter shows the output
level not your wave file level.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Halton" <philhalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "ddots-l" <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:43 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] metering discrepancies
When I check meter levels with an audio track armed, then record on
that track, and then check my levels on playback, there is a big
discrepancy. For example, I had an input level of around -5 DB with an
armed track, then on playback, the meters read around -17 DB. Why the
big discrepancy?
Is this a sonar thing, or something to do with my hardware? I'm using
an Echo Indigo I/O laptop soundcard with sonar 5.2
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
Subject:- faq
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
Subject:- faq
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/653 - Release Date:
26/01/2007
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
Subject:- faq
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
Subject:- faq
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/653 - Release Date:
26/01/2007
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
Subject:- faq
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
- Follow-Ups:
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Mike Christer
- References:
- [ddots-l] metering discrepancies
- From: Phil Halton
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Luis Elorza
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Mike Christer
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Phil Halton
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Mike Christer
Other related posts:
- » [ddots-l] metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- » [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
It might do the trick, possibly showing that Sonar isn't seeing the input properly?
I dunno, might work... Alternatively, have you reset and refreshed the meters etc?----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Halton" <philhalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 4:39 PM Subject: [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
that's what I did, I armed track, and read meter with f2 after first resetting the meter with triple f2. it read approx -5 DB, then on playback with track unarmed, meter read approx -17 db. I changed no settings--I just loaded the normal template into a new session of sonar, and began recording after checking input level. I haven't really given much attention to this aspect of sonar(digital audio recording), and I'll have to investigate it a little more with an eye towards this problem..----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Christer" <m-christer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 9:11 AM Subject: [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepanciesPhil!When looking at the input level, make sure the feedback you get from JAWS says, "input", and not "output"?I guess you know that you should take the meter level when the track is actually armed?Mike Mike----- Original Message ----- From: "Luis Elorza" <luiselorza@xxxxxxxxx>To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 4:18 AM Subject: [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepanciesmaybe you lowered the volume for that track. the meter shows the output level not your wave file level.----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Halton" <philhalt@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: "ddots-l" <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:43 PM Subject: [ddots-l] metering discrepanciesWhen I check meter levels with an audio track armed, then record on that track, and then check my levels on playback, there is a big discrepancy. For example, I had an input level of around -5 DB with an armed track, then on playback, the meters read around -17 DB. Why the big discrepancy?Is this a sonar thing, or something to do with my hardware? I'm using an Echo Indigo I/O laptop soundcard with sonar 5.2** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/653 - Release Date: 26/01/2007** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/653 - Release Date: 26/01/2007
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Mike Christer
- [ddots-l] metering discrepancies
- From: Phil Halton
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Luis Elorza
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Mike Christer
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Phil Halton
- [ddots-l] Re: metering discrepancies
- From: Mike Christer