Re:

From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:36:21 +0200

Yes it was deliberate. It was airborne during the beta. There were a lot
of last minute changes they made that resulted in hit/hurtboxes not
matching animations.

Like seriously Capcom, wtf is up with this?

[image: f4b5fbe8f6.jpg]

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Wasnt that a deliberate change that they made to Karins overhead tho?
It was in the last or beta or something.

They nerfed it not jump over lows properly but took it from -7  to -4 on
block.

Not saying its not bad just that it was a deliberate change instead just a
random funny hit/hurtbox.

Assuming this is talking about what happened @2:45 mark in the finals.
------------------------------
From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Re:
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:07:54 +0000

The low beating the overhead wasn’t intentional? Lol. I thought it was
some inspired play that I would never have tried.

*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
*Sent:* 07 March 2016 11:06 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:

lol SF5

I get these feeeeeellliiiings for you.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:00 AM, euraima tobias <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The best was when a low beat an airborne overhead. lol

On 07 Mar 2016 10:31, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Lol.  I was being sarcastic.

This is why I don't want to enter any more tournaments.  This game makes
me salty when my opponents moves fail when they should work lol.  I watched
the start of the Grand Finals and the first thing you hear me say is "I
hate this game" :-\

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In layman’s terms, why does it take longer to make frame advantage moves?

I’d assume that you have move set and then you specify the recovery. All
you need is the opponent’s recovery to be 1 frame more than the aggressor
and you’re done. I’m guessing from what you said, that ain’t right though.

*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
*Sent:* 07 March 2016 10:25 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:

Capcom needs to finish the game.

It actually makes sense now what Chojin told me yesterday.  Dimps started
on the game but halfway through development moved in-house because of
investor pressure or some shit.  So they game ended up being rushed and a
lot of the stuff that was originally planned (like stage transitions) never
made it in.

It also explains why nothing in this game has frame advantage.  It
obviously takes much longer to make a move that is +3f compared to
something that is -14f.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Capcom just needs to release a tournament build for the game then only EVO
dudes can haz that enables ps3 sticks.

They could do this easily for everyone , but sony and Capcom are money
huggers, so they want you to purchase a new ps4 stick
------------------------------

*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 07 March 2016 08:09 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:

I love how in 2016 you have to perform several ancient magical
incantations every time you switch controllers.  This game will be a
failure at EVO if they don't fix this.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:05 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

there was some hiccups at the start of the tourney , with the ps4 and
sticks taking forever to synch.

Those were easily were quickly sorted out in the end.

------------------------------

*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 07 March 2016 07:58 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:

FAB made a combo vid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isiIfWjgN8k

[image: Image removed by sender.]
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isiIfWjgN8k>

"Ritual of red" - A #GGXRD Potemkin Combo Movie by FAB
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isiIfWjgN8k>

www.youtube.com

Uploaded with permission from FAB. Enjoy.

------------------------------

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.

------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.

Follow-Ups:
- RE:
  - From: Wynand-Ben

References:
- RE:
  - From: Wynand-Ben
- Re:
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Re:
  - From: lindsey kiviets
- Re: Re:
  - From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir
- Re: Re:
  - From: lindsey kiviets
- RE: Re:
  - From: Donaldson, Alasdair
- Re: Re:
  - From: lindsey kiviets
- RE: Re:
  - From: Donaldson, Alasdair
- Re: Re:
  - From: sameegh jardine
- Re: Re:
  - From: Ryan Williams
- Re: Re:
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Re:
  - From: lindsey kiviets
- Re: Re:
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Re:
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Re:
  - From: lindsey kiviets
- Re: Re:
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- RE: Re:
  - From: Donaldson, Alasdair
- Re: Re:
  - From: Ilitirit Sama
- Re: Re:
  - From: euraima tobias
- Re: Re:
  - From: sameegh jardine
- RE: Re:
  - From: Donaldson, Alasdair
- RE:
  - From: Wynand-Ben

Re:

Other related posts: