How do they even monetize these things ? On 28 January 2014 16:30, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > http://i.imgur.com/HpFlvPm.png > > 60 Titans at $7600 = $456000 > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Haha, according to one of the players, the war was started because of a >> bug: >> >> When asked about the sov drop, Manfred Sidious of Pandemic Legion >>> described it as the consequence of a bug, stating that he had enough isk in >>> his holding corp wallet as well as having autopay checked. >>> >> >> http://themittani.com/news/sov-drops-b-r5-immensea-staging-system >> >> Basically someone didn't pay their rent on time, things escalated and one >> corporation decided to squat on the station without paying. And now >> there's a full scale war. >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx >> > wrote: >> >>> Gees Louise. >>> >>> I would love to hear how much real world currency was lost after this >>> war. >>> >>> >>> On 28 January 2014 16:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> It's still happening. >>>> >>>> http://www.twitch.tv/dobbb >>>> >>>> Jump to around 18mins or so for some archived footage. >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asMsuZASPQw >>>> >>>> The scale of this battle is crazy. Each Titan is the size of Manhattan. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < >>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Do they have any vids up of the battles >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama >>>>> *Sent:* 28 January 2014 2:57 PM >>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Largest Eve Online war is currently happening >>>>> >>>>> http://i.imgur.com/CJOnE8p.jpg >>>>> >>>>> 60 Titans down so far. Each Titan costs about $3500 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Stephen Scheidel < >>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Channel the power of Boss Yang >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28/01/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> > I'll play Yang. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> Send me a steam message, not a gtalk message. Sometimes I don't get >>>>> >> them. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:44 PM, lindsey kiviets >>>>> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> I got it working. We play tonyt >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:33:45 +0200 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>>>> >>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I was messing around with Yang tonight. He is so weak in this >>>>> version. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I try to whiff punish Ryu's solar plexus strike on reaction with >>>>> Ultra 2 >>>>> >>> and... it loses. In fact everything beats his Ultra 2. React to >>>>> Ryu's >>>>> >>> tatsu? Beaten. React to overhead? Beaten. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I try to bait out mashing by stopping the rekka early and... I get >>>>> hit. >>>>> >>> Yep, rekkas unsafe on hit. Good luck trying to bait those DP >>>>> mashers. >>>>> >>> I >>>>> >>> try land a rekka combo from a distance vs Akuma and... Akuma does a >>>>> >>> raging >>>>> >>> demon during the combo because the second rekka whiffs ON HIT. I >>>>> try to >>>>> >>> beat wake up Raging Demon (gotta love online warriors...) by doing >>>>> a DP >>>>> >>> on >>>>> >>> his wakeup and... Akuma's Raging Demon pushes the DP while it's >>>>> airborne >>>>> >>> and I land in front of it instead of behind it. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama >>>>> >>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Lies. I said I'll play you on PC. You said you are too lazy to >>>>> >>> reinstall. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:24 PM, lindsey kiviets >>>>> >>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> scumbag ilirtit don't wana fyt my sim. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:11:32 +0200 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>>>> >>> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:27 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Less random teleport, more pokes = effective sim. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Its like that thing I used to do with Yun, shoulder cross under? >>>>> Once >>>>> >>> you >>>>> >>> see, then you know it. Same thing with that Sim teleport thing. You >>>>> >>> don't >>>>> >>> mix it up. You not lame enough to annoy with Sim, LB. But hey, >>>>> glad to >>>>> >>> have >>>>> >>> some more diversity on our screens :-) >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:50 PM, lindsey kiviets >>>>> >>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Tsek wit dat economic principles. The demand is hi for a beatdown, >>>>> ima a >>>>> >>> supply wit dat sim tech. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:41:54 +0200 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi >>>>> >>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> The way people are doing it now are just buying tons of the "newer" >>>>> >>> crypto coins because they are cheaper and easier to mine (pump). >>>>> Then >>>>> >>> they >>>>> >>> sell with they make a 50% return on investment (dump) and then >>>>> look at >>>>> >>> other markets. IMO something might overtake BTC soon because the >>>>> supply >>>>> >>> is >>>>> >>> running out, but that also means that the price will inevitably go >>>>> up >>>>> >>> (unless something drastic happens) until the increase supply. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> If only we invested in bitcoin before i went up that >>>>> >>> high...sigh...wonder >>>>> >>> if dogecoin will be as expensive... >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Ilitirit Sama >>>>> >>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> It's the same type of decentralized currency (there is no central >>>>> >>> reserve >>>>> >>> bank - everyone who has a crypto coin "knows" about every >>>>> transaction). >>>>> >>> 1 >>>>> >>> BitCoin is worth about $850 now. 1 DogeCoin is worth $ 0.0016. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Is Dogecoin the same thing as Bitcoin? isn't bitcoin worth like a >>>>> lot >>>>> >>> now? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Ryan Williams >>>>> >>> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> *LOL* DogeCoin... I wonder what's next. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Ilitirit Sama >>>>> >>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> If anyone's ever been interested in seeing Market Manipulation at >>>>> work, >>>>> >>> look no further than DogeCoin >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Currently the 7th Crypto Currency in terms of market cap. Started >>>>> out >>>>> >>> as >>>>> >>> a joke, gained traction through various social media channels. >>>>> Caught >>>>> >>> the >>>>> >>> interest of shrewd investors who wanted to make a quick million or >>>>> so >>>>> >>> via >>>>> >>> "pump and dump" schemes. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Here's a chat log featuring the guy who started it instructing >>>>> people to >>>>> >>> manipulate the market: >>>>> >>> http://pastebin.com/tZYvK7UD >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> *tl;dr: * >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> DOESN'T MATTER IF U BUY AT 210 >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> 300 >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> I DON'T CARE >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT PRICES >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE SELL 185 >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE MOVE PRICES DOWN FAST >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE BUY BACK >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> 170 >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> YOU SAVED 16 >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> 15 >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> UNLESS YOU WANT TO WAIT >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> HOW MANY DAYS?WEEKS? MONTHS BACK TO 210? 300? >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE DON'T WAIT FOR MARKET TO MOVE >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE MOVE THE MARKET >>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> DAMN IT >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Only a handful of them will make money though. It's a Ponzi >>>>> scheme. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ========================================================================= >>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing >>>>> list. >>>>> >>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail >>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in >>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send >>>>> to >>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. >>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, >>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in >>>>> this >>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing >>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information >>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official >>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. >>>>> >>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or >>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, >>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. >>>>> >>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG >>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services >>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss >>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent >>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no >>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally >>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. >>>>> Information >>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be >>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative. >>>>> >>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by >>>>> AntiVirus software. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >