Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:30:09 +0200
http://i.imgur.com/HpFlvPm.png
60 Titans at $7600 = $456000
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Haha, according to one of the players, the war was started because of a
> bug:
>
> When asked about the sov drop, Manfred Sidious of Pandemic Legion
>> described it as the consequence of a bug, stating that he had enough isk in
>> his holding corp wallet as well as having autopay checked.
>>
>
> http://themittani.com/news/sov-drops-b-r5-immensea-staging-system
>
> Basically someone didn't pay their rent on time, things escalated and one
> corporation decided to squat on the station without paying. And now
> there's a full scale war.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Scheidel
> <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Gees Louise.
>>
>> I would love to hear how much real world currency was lost after this war.
>>
>>
>> On 28 January 2014 16:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> It's still happening.
>>>
>>> http://www.twitch.tv/dobbb
>>>
>>> Jump to around 18mins or so for some archived footage.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asMsuZASPQw
>>>
>>> The scale of this battle is crazy. Each Titan is the size of Manhattan.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do they have any vids up of the battles
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>>>> *Sent:* 28 January 2014 2:57 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Largest Eve Online war is currently happening
>>>>
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/CJOnE8p.jpg
>>>>
>>>> 60 Titans down so far. Each Titan costs about $3500
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Channel the power of Boss Yang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28/01/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> > I'll play Yang.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Send me a steam message, not a gtalk message. Sometimes I don't get
>>>> >> them.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:44 PM, lindsey kiviets
>>>> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> I got it working. We play tonyt
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>>>> >>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> >>> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:33:45 +0200
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>> >>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I was messing around with Yang tonight. He is so weak in this
>>>> version.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I try to whiff punish Ryu's solar plexus strike on reaction with
>>>> Ultra 2
>>>> >>> and... it loses. In fact everything beats his Ultra 2. React to
>>>> Ryu's
>>>> >>> tatsu? Beaten. React to overhead? Beaten.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I try to bait out mashing by stopping the rekka early and... I get
>>>> hit.
>>>> >>> Yep, rekkas unsafe on hit. Good luck trying to bait those DP
>>>> mashers.
>>>> >>> I
>>>> >>> try land a rekka combo from a distance vs Akuma and... Akuma does a
>>>> >>> raging
>>>> >>> demon during the combo because the second rekka whiffs ON HIT. I
>>>> try to
>>>> >>> beat wake up Raging Demon (gotta love online warriors...) by doing
>>>> a DP
>>>> >>> on
>>>> >>> his wakeup and... Akuma's Raging Demon pushes the DP while it's
>>>> airborne
>>>> >>> and I land in front of it instead of behind it.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>> >>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Lies. I said I'll play you on PC. You said you are too lazy to
>>>> >>> reinstall.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:24 PM, lindsey kiviets
>>>> >>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> scumbag ilirtit don't wana fyt my sim.
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>>>> >>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> >>> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:11:32 +0200
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>> >>> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:27 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Less random teleport, more pokes = effective sim.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Its like that thing I used to do with Yun, shoulder cross under?
>>>> Once
>>>> >>> you
>>>> >>> see, then you know it. Same thing with that Sim teleport thing. You
>>>> >>> don't
>>>> >>> mix it up. You not lame enough to annoy with Sim, LB. But hey, glad
>>>> to
>>>> >>> have
>>>> >>> some more diversity on our screens :-)
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:50 PM, lindsey kiviets
>>>> >>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Tsek wit dat economic principles. The demand is hi for a beatdown,
>>>> ima a
>>>> >>> supply wit dat sim tech.
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>>>> >>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> >>> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:41:54 +0200
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>> >>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The way people are doing it now are just buying tons of the "newer"
>>>> >>> crypto coins because they are cheaper and easier to mine (pump).
>>>> Then
>>>> >>> they
>>>> >>> sell with they make a 50% return on investment (dump) and then look
>>>> at
>>>> >>> other markets. IMO something might overtake BTC soon because the
>>>> supply
>>>> >>> is
>>>> >>> running out, but that also means that the price will inevitably go
>>>> up
>>>> >>> (unless something drastic happens) until the increase supply.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If only we invested in bitcoin before i went up that
>>>> >>> high...sigh...wonder
>>>> >>> if dogecoin will be as expensive...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>> >>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> It's the same type of decentralized currency (there is no central
>>>> >>> reserve
>>>> >>> bank - everyone who has a crypto coin "knows" about every
>>>> transaction).
>>>> >>> 1
>>>> >>> BitCoin is worth about $850 now. 1 DogeCoin is worth $ 0.0016.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Is Dogecoin the same thing as Bitcoin? isn't bitcoin worth like a
>>>> lot
>>>> >>> now?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Ryan Williams
>>>> >>> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> *LOL* DogeCoin... I wonder what's next.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>>> >>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If anyone's ever been interested in seeing Market Manipulation at
>>>> work,
>>>> >>> look no further than DogeCoin
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Currently the 7th Crypto Currency in terms of market cap. Started
>>>> out
>>>> >>> as
>>>> >>> a joke, gained traction through various social media channels.
>>>> Caught
>>>> >>> the
>>>> >>> interest of shrewd investors who wanted to make a quick million or
>>>> so
>>>> >>> via
>>>> >>> "pump and dump" schemes.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Here's a chat log featuring the guy who started it instructing
>>>> people to
>>>> >>> manipulate the market:
>>>> >>> http://pastebin.com/tZYvK7UD
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>>
>>>> >>> *tl;dr: *
>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> DOESN'T MATTER IF U BUY AT 210
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> 300
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> I DON'T CARE
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT PRICES
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE SELL 185
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE MOVE PRICES DOWN FAST
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE BUY BACK
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> 170
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> YOU SAVED 16
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> 15
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> UNLESS YOU WANT TO WAIT
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> HOW MANY DAYS?WEEKS? MONTHS BACK TO 210? 300?
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE DON'T WAIT FOR MARKET TO MOVE
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> WE MOVE THE MARKET
>>>> >>> 00:48 <@[-wolong-]> DAMN IT
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Only a handful of them will make money though. It's a Ponzi scheme.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> =========================================================================
>>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
