[citw150] Re: CITW 150 L3 Q6
- From: Daniele Fahrni <ddfahrni@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: citw150@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:22:32 -0800 (PST)
I agree, but I think parents should be held responsible for monitoring their
children. It should not be up to someone else outside the home.
Katherine Jennifer Dredge <dredgeka@xxxxxxx> wrote:A site I find "interesting"
is http://www.rotten.com
In short, this site shows various images that tend to be disturbing and
violent by most. If you go to this site and click on "words" on the left
side, this explains the rotten staff's view on how this site is considered
by some to be obscene while they seem to think the worst image is book
burning...hmmm
Depending on the beliefs of viewers, I would say this site could fall under
both porn/obsenity and prejudice/hatred, depending also on the image. The
rottten staff claim that this is "educational". I think this is a stretch
and there should be parental guidance on what images are allowable for kids.
Katie Dredge
dredgeka@xxxxxxx
.............
../\_____/\..
.( ). MEOWWW!
..\ v /..
....\=U=/....
.............
Daniele Fahrni
"Lack of planning on your part
is no cause for urgency on mine"
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
Other related posts:
