# The following was supposedly scribed by # Bruno Postle # on Monday 05 April 2004 07:34 am: >NFS is robust and fast, it supports locking etc.. - So long as you >restrict your data-channel requirements to filesystem semantics. > >FAM works with NFS (it listens on another port as you suggest) so >you can have the server notify the client of changes without having >to poll. From my slight experience, NFS has some warts on it. In something intended to be distributed across the internet, I think we would want better than host-based security. It seems that I've read something about the new NFS supporting better security models, but maybe you can correct me on that. --Eric -- "...our schools have been scientifically designed to prevent overeducation from happening." --William Troy Harris