well but they still are in a way. read the article and be informed. -----Original Message----- From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dave Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 11:02 PM To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger Dave To read about the next Peace Seekers meeting click on the link below. http://www.ThePeaceSeekers.org/program/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Walt Smith" <ka3agm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 5:04 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger > Which is not the same thing as your statement that batteries were damaged. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Jones" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 7:55 PM > Subject: [bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger > > > It says in the article that the 15-minute chargers only seem to charge > the > batteries 85% and even if left in over night they don't seem to fully > charge > the batteries. > > -----Original Message----- > From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Chris Hill > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 6:15 PM > To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [bookport] Re: a source for rechargeable batteries and charger > > Are you thinking heat damage? You could be right, but even if you > only get 100 charges instead of 200, they are still a good deal, > especially when you figure in convenience. > > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:44:06 -0500, you wrote: > >>The problem with the 15 minute chargers is that they in part damage the >>batteries while charging them >>The Maha 204w charger seems to be the best all around nimh charger > currently >>You can get lots of cool information if you read >>The great battery shootout >>By >>David Etchells >>Here's the link >>http://www.imaging-resource.com/ACCS/BATTS/BATTS.HTM >> >> > > > >