[bookcourier] Re: missing bookcourier mailing list messages
- From: "Sean Randall" <sean-r@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:06:22 +0100
If it's any consolation,
An update will almost certainly spark multiple responses and the laws of
probability are in your favour for getting at least one.
Ciao,
Sean R.
Time reveals everything. -- The Doctor, in "The Keeper of Traken"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Epley" <gregepley@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:44 PM
Subject: [bookcourier] Re: missing bookcourier mailing list messages
I always route messages from lists into their own folder so I know exactly
what I'm getting - or not getting - as the case may be. It's not my ISP,
because others on different ISPs have the same problem I do. I find the
web
based archives difficult to navigate - maybe others don't mind them, but I
have better things to do with my time, especially when I should be getting
the messages. I find myself constantly checking Springer's web site for
updates, afraid that sort of message is the kind I'll never see despite
being subscribed to this list. I don't know what the problem is - I don't
know if it's something with freelists, or something specific to the
BookCourier list, or what the problem is, but I do know there seems to be
nothing I can do to fix it, so I guess I'll just sit out here in a black
hole and hope I can stay up to date.
-Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "A. Lester Buck III" <bookcourier-reg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 12:17 PM
Subject: [bookcourier] missing bookcourier mailing list messages
>
>>Obviously I'm missing some posts again, and have no idea why it's always
>>this list and no other freelists list that causes me this issue.
>
> I save all the bookcourier messages automatically into a folder, and I
> don't seem to be missing any. But it's easy to be sure. In fact, it
> would be pretty easy to follow the list without every subscribing,
> because
> the archives are on the web for anyone to read:
>
> //www.freelists.org/archives/bookcourier/
>
>
> If ever in doubt, just check the archives against what you have
> received.
>
> While tracking down the bookcourier list archives, I stumbled across the
> bookshare list, too. That was well hidden. I looked around in vain on
> the BookShare.org site for a list to join.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lester
>
>
Other related posts:
