[blind-democracy] Re: Helpful Primmer on 13 military terms

  • From: Miriam Vieni <miriamvieni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:01:44 -0500

Clarifying, but not comforting.

Miriam

________________________________

From: blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:blind-democracy-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martian.Lady
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 1:56 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Helpful Primmer on 13 military terms




It is important info. I've got a copy for reference purposes, especially
since 3 of the kids (now adults) who used to stay all night and eat here
regularly enlisted/signed up last year, and deployed after graduation. sigh



http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a39786/primer-understandi
ng-military-terminology/



A Helpful Primer on 13 Military Terms


Journos and pols may not understand them, but now you do.


BY ROBERT BATEMAN <http://www.esquire.com/author/7770/robert-bateman/>


At this point I refuse to join the cacophony. It is too soon after the
attacks in Paris this past Friday. Instead, I offer this basic primer on
military terms to help decipher what you read, hear, and see in the news.
The pundits, the newsheads, and all of the associated bloviating masses are
throwing out a lot of words. Consider this a dictionary you can use when
evaluating what you hear on the news.

Terminology matters. When a newsman says something like, "The US is sending
squads," but what he really mean is "squadrons," he's off by several
thousand people. The terms that follow apply to ground forces, mostly. Maybe
later we will get into the air and the sea. But for now, political figures
and broadcasters and reporters are throwing out numbers, so we ought to
understand their basis, even if they do not.


Squad


Anywhere from seven to14 enlisted men and women. Usually refers to a ground
unit. Always a part of a larger organization. It is led by a "sergeant"
(there are various grades of those, but we need not worry about that now)
who has several years of experience.


Platoon


Three to five "squads", led by a college graduate, a lieutenant, between 22
and 25 years old. Thankfully, he has an older sergeant as his partner who
usually keeps him from screwing up too badly. Depending upon the Service,
and the type of unit, this is 20 to 50 men and women.


Company


Led by a "Captain" with four to nine years of service as an officer, this is
three to five platoons. He too has a senior sergeant, known as the "First
Sergeant," who coaches the young officer. In combat units this is usually
124 to 300 men and women.


Battalion


This is three to five companies. A "cavalry" unit of this same level may be
referred to as a "Squadron." This size of unit ranges from 700 to 1200 men
and women. It is commanded by a Lieutenant Colonel with anywhere from 17 to
23 years of commissioned service. Do not confuse "squad" with "squadron."
Side note: In air units, this has an entirely different definition. But we
can deal with that later.


Brigade/Regiment


A complex term, historically speaking. The simple answer is that this is a
force of anywhere from 3,000 to 6,000 men and women. The commander is an
"O6" (Officer grade #6), a full Colonel. Again, the same ratio applies:
Several battalions combined together under a single commander.

There are higher levels, Division, Corps, etc, but we don't need to address
those now.

Types of units can also confuse. If you understand the terminology that
defines our highly trained specialist forces, you can quickly discern which
politicians and journalists have at least an idea of what they are talking
about (or who have advisors who do), and those who have absolutely no clue.
Here is the cheap and easy list of terms:


Special Operations Forces, a.k.a. "SOF"


This is actually a collective term referring to several different units,
each with distinctly different missions and capabilities. They are generally
grouped under this title because there is a unifying command that controls
their actions, known as Special Operations Command, based in Tampa, Florida.
But when a politician says something like, "We need to use 'SOF' to do X,"
that is like an ESPN commentator saying, "We need to use the Eagles to play
football." SOF refers to all of the types of units below, and they, like
snowflakes, are all unique:


Special Forces (Army)


These are your "Green Berets." Generally speaking, they prefer to teach
others how to fight, though they have the ability to do small unit (three-
to 12-man) reconnaissance operations and targeted killing. Total size, a
few thousand. They operate in "Teams" of 12 men.


SEALS (Navy)


Pure commandos. They are as fast and violent as needed. There are only a few
hundred of them, including their support elements. Total size, several
dozen. They are limited to very specific targets like Osama Bin Laden.


Rangers (Army)


America's "shock troops." A U.S. Army Airborne Ranger battalion has 750 to
1000 troops (depending upon the mission). These are the most highly trained
and prepared combat troops in the world. We only have three battalions of
them. Need to take an airfield in some godforsaken land so that you can
bring in other, heavier forces? The Rangers are your shock troops of choice.


USAF ParaRescue


Small unit of the Air Force, explicitly designed to rescue downed pilots
behind enemy lines. A few dozen in strength.


Marine Recon


Only nominally in "SOF", this is the "go out and look" team for the Marine
Corps. Usually, however, they refuse to operate under "SOF" command and only
answer to the Marine Corps for training and combat preparation.


"Combat Troops"


Now we are getting into the haziest area for those unfamiliar with the
military. All forces are divided by their purpose as either "Combat,"
"Combat Support," or "Combat Service Support." (We will get to "advisors" in
a minute.)

Here is how you can think about it: Imagine you have a friend, 6' 4'', 240
pounds, and inclined to take things to a physical level when you are in a
bar and somebody steps out of line. That is your "combat arms."

You, on the other hand, are an enabler. You are "combat support." If it
comes to a fight, you're there, and you will be swinging. But you are only
5' 11'', 185 pounds, and you really see yourself as the guy who protects
your buddy's back (and passes him a beer when he is parched). You can fight,
but that's not your real role. You just make things possible.

Finally, there is your buddy who stands 5' 2''. He is essential. He
bankrolls you and knows where the hospital is, has a med kit for immediate
purposes, and he has the car. When a fight starts he heads for the car and
brings it around front, motor running. He is "Combat Service Support." When
the big guy takes one on the nose, you (Combat Support) are the one that
gets him out of the fight and blocks the door behind you. You drag his ass
out to the car where your partner (Combat Service Support) is ready to move
him to care. Follow?

There is a lot more to it than that, but this suffices for now.


"Advisors"


This is a special category. Advisors can be any one of the Combat three, and
their job is just as described: Their mission is not kicking ass, but
teaching others to do that, and to support and do combat service support.
Unfortunately, to do that they have to go out with their foreign mentees,
and sometimes that means that they get shot at too. To be clear, just
because you are getting shot at does not make you a "combat troop."

Politicians don't want to admit Americans are "in combat," and to do this
they twist themselves in linguistic knots by denying that "advisors" are
"combat troops." Grammatically, this is correct. Morally, it makes as much
sense as tits on a boar hog.

I can be reached at R_Bateman_LTC@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:R_Bateman_LTC@xxxxxxxxxxx> .



__._,_.___
________________________________

Posted by: ali redford <rredford112@xxxxxxxxx>


Other related posts: